Here
audience Reviews
, 58% Audience Score- Rating: 4.5 out of 5 starsIt was a nice movie. A little confusion at times but nice. Not for everybody because it kept going back and forth from present to older times. The ending was very nice
- Rating: 3.5 out of 5 starsExcellent concept done well. Not exactly uplifing but definately enagaging.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsI was soooooo bored. The only reason I went to see this Tom Hanks. Boy was I disappointed. I get what Robert Zemekis tried to do but it didn't work. Don't waist your time.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 starsNot Tom Hanks best movie! Slow start, but amazing how how the actors /actresses aged.
- Rating: 2.5 out of 5 starsThe acting was great, characters well developed and believeable,, the cinematography creative and "efficient" and the ending poignant. Sadly, it was, at several points, tedious and dragged on a bit, even though the run time was on the short side. Don't rush out to see this one.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsVery well constructed, and impeccably acted.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsThe movie was boring, the premise was weak, and the story line lacked depth.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 starsVery nostalgic tail of a house built in the turn of the century and the people and lives that gave the house life and history. Very interesting how the whole movie was filmed in one camera angle until the very end. It was amazing how they made Tom Hanks hand Robin Wright pen look like teenagers again as they grow older and went through lifes ups and downs. I related to the movie.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 starsThis is the first Tom Hanks movie I did not enjoy. The whole movie was flashbacks and each flashback was a few minutes each and constantly jumping back and forth Plot was difficult to find and follow. It was sad and depressing in so many ways. I was expecting something spectacular and was so disappointed.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 starsAs a seasoned citizen I related to the entire film. It touched my heart. Not sure that someone younger would feel the same way